<< 羅馬書 7:7 >>

本节经文

  • 文理委辦譯本
    然則何以言之、律法豈惡之因乎、曰、不然、非法無以見惡、蓋律法不禁欲、吾末由識欲、
  • 新标点和合本
    这样,我们可说什么呢?律法是罪吗?断乎不是!只是非因律法,我就不知何为罪。非律法说“不可起贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 和合本2010(上帝版)
    这样,我们要怎么说呢?律法是罪吗?绝对不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何为罪;若不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 和合本2010(神版)
    这样,我们要怎么说呢?律法是罪吗?绝对不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何为罪;若不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 当代译本
    那么,我们可以说律法本身是罪吗?当然不是!没有律法,我们就不知道什么是罪。律法若不说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心。
  • 圣经新译本
    这样,我们可以说什么呢?难道律法是罪吗?绝对不是。不过,如果不是藉着律法,我就不知道什么是罪;如果不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心。
  • 中文标准译本
    那么,我们要怎么说呢?难道律法是罪吗?绝对不是!然而,要不是藉着律法,我就不知道什么是罪。如果律法没有说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心;
  • 新標點和合本
    這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?律法是罪嗎?斷乎不是!只是非因律法,我就不知何為罪。非律法說「不可起貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 和合本2010(上帝版)
    這樣,我們要怎麼說呢?律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何為罪;若不是律法說「不可貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 和合本2010(神版)
    這樣,我們要怎麼說呢?律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何為罪;若不是律法說「不可貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 當代譯本
    那麼,我們可以說律法本身是罪嗎?當然不是!沒有律法,我們就不知道什麼是罪。律法若不說「不可貪心」,我就不知道什麼是貪心。
  • 聖經新譯本
    這樣,我們可以說甚麼呢?難道律法是罪嗎?絕對不是。不過,如果不是藉著律法,我就不知道甚麼是罪;如果不是律法說“不可貪心”,我就不知道甚麼是貪心。
  • 呂振中譯本
    這樣,我們可怎麼說呢?律法是罪麼?斷乎不是。不過、若不是由於律法,我就不知道罪是甚麼。若不是律法說:「你不可貪慾」,我就不知道貪慾是甚麼。
  • 中文標準譯本
    那麼,我們要怎麼說呢?難道律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!然而,要不是藉著律法,我就不知道什麼是罪。如果律法沒有說「不可貪心」,我就不知道什麼是貪心;
  • 文理和合譯本
    然則將何言耶、律豈罪乎、非也、非由律則我未嘗知罪、如律不言毋欲、則我不知欲、
  • 施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經
    然則何言、律法即罪乎、非也、然非由律法、我不識罪、律法若不云勿貪、則我不識貪、
  • 吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集
    於此吾人更有何說?將謂法即罪乎?無是理也!法非罪、乃所以燭吾之罪耳。法若不曰「毋淫、」則吾將不知淫之為淫矣。
  • New International Version
    What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New International Reader's Version
    What should we say then? That the law is sinful? Not at all! Yet I wouldn’t have known what sin was unless the law had told me. The law says,“ Do not want what belongs to other people.”( Exodus 20:17; Deuteronomy 5:21) If the law hadn’t said that, I would not have known what it was like to want what belongs to others.
  • English Standard Version
    What then shall we say? That the law is sin? By no means! Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New Living Translation
    Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said,“ You must not covet.”
  • Christian Standard Bible
    What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! But I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.
  • New American Standard Bible
    What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New King James Version
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • American Standard Version
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:
  • Holman Christian Standard Bible
    What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.
  • King James Version
    What shall we say then?[ Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
  • New English Translation
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! Certainly, I would not have known sin except through the law. For indeed I would not have known what it means to desire something belonging to someone else if the law had not said,“ Do not covet.”
  • World English Bible
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin, except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting, unless the law had said,“ You shall not covet.”

交叉引用

  • 羅馬書 3:20
    蓋恃法而行者、無人得稱義於上帝前、法第使人知罪耳、
  • 羅馬書 7:8
    惡以誡而乘機、眾欲動於中、未有法、則惡不生、
  • 出埃及記 20:17
    毋貪人宅第、妻室、僕婢、牛驢、與凡屬於人者。○
  • 申命記 5:21
    毋貪人妻室、宅第、田畝、僕婢、牛驢、與凡屬於人者。○
  • 羅馬書 4:15
    有法、此有刑、無法、則無犯法、
  • 哥林多前書 15:56
    死為害者罪也、罪克我者法也、
  • 羅馬書 13:9
    誡曰、勿淫、勿殺、勿竊、勿妄證、勿貪、其餘一言以蔽之、曰、愛人如己、
  • 詩篇 19:7-12
    耶和華兮、其律全備、可以蘇困兮、其法真實、可以破愚兮、其命正直、可以悅志兮、其誠純潔、可以發矇兮、其道至清而至久兮、其典至公而至義兮、較金尤貴兮、雖兼金之豐饒、亦無足比兮、較蜜尤甘兮、雖蜂房之滴瀝、亦不能擬兮、我為爾僕、得此兮為儆戒、守此兮為大賚、人有過失、孰能自知兮、苟愆尤之誤犯、願赦宥之予加兮、
  • 羅馬書 3:5
    我今所言者、藉人言耳、曰、我不義、益彰上帝之義、吾何以稱之哉、如是而上帝施刑、豈義乎、
  • 以弗所書 5:3
    聖徒不言淫行、污穢、貪婪、乃其宜也、
  • 創世記 3:6
    婦視其樹、食可適口、觀可娛目、能益智慧、使人生慕、故取果食之、亦以奉夫、夫亦食之。
  • 羅馬書 7:13
    曰、誡既善、乃為死我何耶、曰、不然、我之惡、以誡之善致死、是我之惡、因誡愈形其惡者也、
  • 撒母耳記下 11:2
    日昃、大闢自床起、陟宮巔而遨遊、見婦沐浴、色殊艶麗。
  • 詩篇 119:96
    我詳察萬理、物雖至美、亦歸於盡、惟爾道無窮兮。○
  • 約書亞記 7:21
    我見於貨財中、自示拿至之美衣、銀百兩、金片二十五兩、則貪而取之、今在幕中、藏於地、銀置於下。
  • 路加福音 12:15
    遂謂眾曰、慎戒勿貪、蓋人之生、不在所蓄之贏餘也、○
  • 彌迦書 2:2
    彼貪人田廬、而強據之、人與第宅、及凡所有、俱遭暴虐、
  • 馬太福音 5:28
    惟我語汝、見色而好之者、心已淫矣、
  • 羅馬書 4:1
    曰、何以稱之、吾祖亞伯拉罕徒事儀文、有所得乎、
  • 使徒行傳 20:33
    我未嘗貪人金銀幣帛、
  • 羅馬書 7:5
    當我從欲時、情轉因律法而為惡、動乎四體、厥果惟死、
  • 約翰一書 2:15-16
    勿溺世故、人而溺世、則不敬愛父者也、蓋世人心為欲所役、目為物所引、驕泰邪侈、非父使之然、由世所誘、
  • 歌羅西書 3:5
    故當滅去人欲、即淫行、污穢、比頑童、邪僻、貪婪、貪婪與拜偶像一也、
  • 列王紀上 21:1-4
    撒馬利亞王亞哈有離宮、在耶斯烈、鄰拿泊之葡萄園。亞哈告拿泊曰、爾之園囿、鄰我宮闈、爾當給我為圃、或易以佳園、或予以所值、任爾擇焉。拿泊曰、是業乃我祖所遺、爾欲得之。我指耶和華以誓、斷不能從。亞哈聞言、知其不欲以祖遺業予人、憂憤交集、歸卧於床、面壁不食。
  • 帖撒羅尼迦前書 4:5
    毋縱慾、如異邦人不識上帝、
  • 羅馬書 7:11
    蓋惡以誡乘機誘我、因而死我、
  • 羅馬書 6:15
    曰、不法是主、而恩是主、可犯罪乎、曰、不可、