<< 羅馬書 7:7 >>

本节经文

  • 中文標準譯本
    那麼,我們要怎麼說呢?難道律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!然而,要不是藉著律法,我就不知道什麼是罪。如果律法沒有說「不可貪心」,我就不知道什麼是貪心;
  • 新标点和合本
    这样,我们可说什么呢?律法是罪吗?断乎不是!只是非因律法,我就不知何为罪。非律法说“不可起贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 和合本2010(上帝版)
    这样,我们要怎么说呢?律法是罪吗?绝对不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何为罪;若不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 和合本2010(神版)
    这样,我们要怎么说呢?律法是罪吗?绝对不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何为罪;若不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 当代译本
    那么,我们可以说律法本身是罪吗?当然不是!没有律法,我们就不知道什么是罪。律法若不说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心。
  • 圣经新译本
    这样,我们可以说什么呢?难道律法是罪吗?绝对不是。不过,如果不是藉着律法,我就不知道什么是罪;如果不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心。
  • 中文标准译本
    那么,我们要怎么说呢?难道律法是罪吗?绝对不是!然而,要不是藉着律法,我就不知道什么是罪。如果律法没有说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心;
  • 新標點和合本
    這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?律法是罪嗎?斷乎不是!只是非因律法,我就不知何為罪。非律法說「不可起貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 和合本2010(上帝版)
    這樣,我們要怎麼說呢?律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何為罪;若不是律法說「不可貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 和合本2010(神版)
    這樣,我們要怎麼說呢?律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何為罪;若不是律法說「不可貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 當代譯本
    那麼,我們可以說律法本身是罪嗎?當然不是!沒有律法,我們就不知道什麼是罪。律法若不說「不可貪心」,我就不知道什麼是貪心。
  • 聖經新譯本
    這樣,我們可以說甚麼呢?難道律法是罪嗎?絕對不是。不過,如果不是藉著律法,我就不知道甚麼是罪;如果不是律法說“不可貪心”,我就不知道甚麼是貪心。
  • 呂振中譯本
    這樣,我們可怎麼說呢?律法是罪麼?斷乎不是。不過、若不是由於律法,我就不知道罪是甚麼。若不是律法說:「你不可貪慾」,我就不知道貪慾是甚麼。
  • 文理和合譯本
    然則將何言耶、律豈罪乎、非也、非由律則我未嘗知罪、如律不言毋欲、則我不知欲、
  • 文理委辦譯本
    然則何以言之、律法豈惡之因乎、曰、不然、非法無以見惡、蓋律法不禁欲、吾末由識欲、
  • 施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經
    然則何言、律法即罪乎、非也、然非由律法、我不識罪、律法若不云勿貪、則我不識貪、
  • 吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集
    於此吾人更有何說?將謂法即罪乎?無是理也!法非罪、乃所以燭吾之罪耳。法若不曰「毋淫、」則吾將不知淫之為淫矣。
  • New International Version
    What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New International Reader's Version
    What should we say then? That the law is sinful? Not at all! Yet I wouldn’t have known what sin was unless the law had told me. The law says,“ Do not want what belongs to other people.”( Exodus 20:17; Deuteronomy 5:21) If the law hadn’t said that, I would not have known what it was like to want what belongs to others.
  • English Standard Version
    What then shall we say? That the law is sin? By no means! Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New Living Translation
    Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said,“ You must not covet.”
  • Christian Standard Bible
    What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! But I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.
  • New American Standard Bible
    What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New King James Version
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • American Standard Version
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:
  • Holman Christian Standard Bible
    What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.
  • King James Version
    What shall we say then?[ Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
  • New English Translation
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! Certainly, I would not have known sin except through the law. For indeed I would not have known what it means to desire something belonging to someone else if the law had not said,“ Do not covet.”
  • World English Bible
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin, except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting, unless the law had said,“ You shall not covet.”

交叉引用

  • 羅馬書 3:20
    因為沒有一個人本於律法上的行為在神面前被稱為義;原來,藉著律法,只能對罪有真正的認識。
  • 羅馬書 7:8
    但是,罪藉著誡命,趁機在我裡面生出種種貪念。原來在律法之外,罪是死的。
  • 出埃及記 20:17
  • 申命記 5:21
  • 羅馬書 4:15
    事實上,律法帶來了震怒,所以哪裡沒有律法,哪裡也就沒有過犯。
  • 哥林多前書 15:56
    死亡的毒刺就是罪,而罪的權勢就是律法。
  • 羅馬書 13:9
    這是因為,那「不可通姦,不可殺人,不可偷竊,不可貪心」的誡命,或是別的什麼誡命,都包含在「要愛鄰如己」這一句話裡了。
  • 詩篇 19:7-12
    耶和華的律法純全,使人靈魂甦醒;耶和華的法度信實,使無知的人有智慧;耶和華的訓誡正直,使人心歡喜;耶和華的誡命純潔,使人眼目明亮;對耶和華的敬畏是純淨的,存留到永遠;耶和華的法規是真實的,全然公義;它們比金子、比大量的純金更珍貴;比蜂蜜、比蜂巢下滴的蜜更甘甜。而且你的僕人也藉著它們受警戒,遵守它們就有豐盛的賞賜。誰能察覺自己的過失呢?求你赦免我隱而未現的過失。
  • 羅馬書 3:5
    但是,如果我按人的意思來說,我們的不義可以顯明神的義,那我們要怎麼說呢?難道降震怒的神是不公正的嗎?
  • 以弗所書 5:3
    至於淫亂和一切汙穢,或是貪心,在你們中間連提都不可提,這樣才與聖徒相宜。
  • 創世記 3:6
    女人見那棵樹的果實作為食物很好,又悅人眼目,並且因使人有智慧而令人喜愛,就摘下果實吃了,還給了與她在一起的丈夫,她丈夫也吃了。
  • 羅馬書 7:13
    那麼,是那美善的導致了我的死嗎?絕對不是!而是罪。罪為要顯出是罪,就藉著那美善的帶來了我的死,使罪藉著誡命變得極其邪惡。
  • 撒母耳記下 11:2
    有一天,傍晚的時候,大衛從床上起來,在王宮的屋頂上走動。他從屋頂上看見一個女人在洗澡,這女人容貌極其美麗。
  • 詩篇 119:96
    我看見一切完美的事都有盡頭,唯有你的誡命極其寬闊。
  • 約書亞記 7:21
  • 路加福音 12:15
    接著耶穌對他們說:「你們要注意,要提防一切貪心,因為一個人的生命不在於他財產的豐厚。」
  • 彌迦書 2:2
  • 馬太福音 5:28
    但是我告訴你們:所有懷著慾念看女人的,就已經在心裡和她通姦了。
  • 羅馬書 4:1
    那麼,我們說我們肉體上的先祖亞伯拉罕得到了什麼呢?
  • 使徒行傳 20:33
    我沒有渴望過任何人的金子、銀子或衣服。
  • 羅馬書 7:5
    原來,當我們還在肉體中的時候,罪的欲望藉著律法在我們身體的各部分做工,以致為死亡結了果子。
  • 約翰一書 2:15-16
    你們不要愛世界,也不要愛世界上的事物。如果有人愛世界,父的愛就不在他裡面了。原來世界上一切肉體的欲望、眼目的欲望、今生的驕傲,都不是出於父,而是出於世界的。
  • 歌羅西書 3:5
    所以,當把你們屬世的各個部分看為死了的,就如淫亂、汙穢、邪情、惡慾和貪心,貪心就是拜偶像。
  • 列王紀上 21:1-4
  • 帖撒羅尼迦前書 4:5
    而不要像那些不認識神的外邦人那樣,放縱邪情私慾;
  • 羅馬書 7:11
    事實上,罪藉著誡命趁機欺騙了我,並藉著誡命殺了我。
  • 羅馬書 6:15
    那又怎麼樣呢?難道因為我們不在律法之下而在恩典之下,就可以犯罪嗎?絕對不可!