作工的得工資，不算是恩典，是他應得的。

做工的得工价，不算恩典，乃是该得的；

做工的得工资不算是恩典，而是应得的；

做工的得工资不算是恩典，而是应得的；

人工作得来的工钱不算是恩典，是应得的。

作工的得工资，不算是恩典，是他应得的。

做工的人得工钱，不算是恩典，而是应得的；

做工的得工價，不算恩典，乃是該得的；

做工的得工資不算是恩典，而是應得的；

做工的得工資不算是恩典，而是應得的；

人工作得來的工錢不算是恩典，是應得的。

工錢給作工的人、原不是按恩惠、而是按「該得」算的；

做工的人得工錢，不算是恩典，而是應得的；

夫行者得賞、非為恩、乃其所宜、

凡行法者、其賞不為恩、乃宜也、

凡行者得賞、非由恩也、由所宜也、

若徒憑事功、則其所得者乃為酬報、不復為恩賜矣。

Now to the one who works, wages are not credited as a gift but as an obligation.

When a person works, their pay is not considered a gift. It is owed to them.

Now to the one who works, his wages are not counted as a gift but as his due.

When people work, their wages are not a gift, but something they have earned.

Now to the one who works, pay is not credited as a gift, but as something owed.

Now to the one who works, the wages are not credited as a favor, but as what is due.

Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt.

Now to him that worketh, the reward is not reckoned as of grace, but as of debt.

Now to the one who works, pay is not considered as a gift, but as something owed.

Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

Now to the one who works, his pay is not credited due to grace but due to obligation.

Now to him who works, the reward is not counted as grace, but as something owed.

既然是靠著恩典，就不再是由於行為了；不然的話，恩典就不再是恩典了。

“天國好像一個家主，清早出去雇請工人到他的葡萄園工作。他和工人講定了一天的工錢是一個銀幣，然後派他們到葡萄園去。大約九點鐘，他又出去，看見還有人閒站在街市上，就對他們說：‘你們也到葡萄園來吧，我會給你們合理的工錢。’他們就去了。約在正午和下午三點鐘，他又出去，也是這樣作。下午五點鐘左右，他再出去，看見還有人站著，就問他們：‘你們為甚麼整天站在這裡不去作工？’他們回答：‘沒有人用我們。’他說：‘你們也到葡萄園來吧。’到了黃昏，園主對管工說：‘把工人叫來，給他們工錢，從最後的開始，到最先來的。’那些下午五點鐘才開始作工的人來了，每個人都領到一個銀幣。最先作工的人也來了，以為會多得一點，但每個人也是領到一個銀幣。他們領到之後，就埋怨家主，說：‘我們整天在烈日之下勞苦，這些後來的人只工作了一個小時，你卻給他們跟我們一樣的工錢。’家主回答他們當中的一個，說：‘朋友，我並沒有虧待你。你我不是講定了一個銀幣嗎？拿你的工錢走吧！我給那後來的和給你的一樣，是我的主意。難道我不可以照自己的主意用我的財物嗎？還是因為我仁慈你就嫉妒呢？’因此，在後的將要在前，在前的將要在後。”

這是甚麼緣故呢？因為他們不憑信心，只靠行為。他們絆倒在那絆腳石上，

“誰先給了他，以致他要償還呢？”