For, on the one hand, there is the nullification of a former commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

先前的条例，因软弱无益，所以废掉了，

一方面，先前的诫命因软弱无能而废掉了，

一方面，先前的诫命因软弱无能而废掉了，

以前的条例由于本身的弱点和无益被废除了，

一方面，从前的条例因为软弱，没有用处，就废弃了；

原来，一方面，先前的条例因着本身的软弱和无用，就被废弃了，

先前的條例，因軟弱無益，所以廢掉了，

一方面，先前的誡命因軟弱無能而廢掉了，

一方面，先前的誡命因軟弱無能而廢掉了，

以前的條例由於本身的弱點和無益被廢除了，

一方面，從前的條例因為軟弱，沒有用處，就廢棄了；

這一來，一方面因規條之劣弱和無益，先前的條例就被廢掉（

原來，一方面，先前的條例因著本身的軟弱和無用，就被廢棄了，

夫前誡因荏弱無益而廢、

夫舊法無益、罔有功效、則遂廢弛、

前之法度、輕弱無益、故廢之、

是則舊制由於荏弱無能、而遭廢棄、

The former regulation is set aside because it was weak and useless

The old rule is set aside. It was weak and useless.

For on the one hand, a former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness

Yes, the old requirement about the priesthood was set aside because it was weak and useless.

So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable

For on the one hand there is an annulling of the former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness,

For there is a disannulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness

So the previous command is annulled because it was weak and unprofitable

For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.

On the one hand a former command is set aside because it is weak and useless,

For there is an annulling of a foregoing commandment because of its weakness and uselessness

For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh,

and through Him everyone who believes is freed from all things, from which you could not be freed through the Law of Moses.

But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how is it that you turn back again to the weak and worthless elementary principles, to which you want to be enslaved all over again?

So if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood( for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also.

( for the Law made nothing perfect); on the other hand, there is the introduction of a better hope, through which we come near to God.

for bodily training is just slightly beneficial, but godliness is beneficial for all things, since it holds promise for the present life and also for the life to come.

For if that first covenant had been free of fault, no circumstances would have been sought for a second.For in finding fault with the people, He says,“ Behold, days are coming, says the Lord, When I will bring about a new covenant With the house of Israel and the house of Judah,Not like the covenant which I made with their fathers On the day I took them by the hand To bring them out of the land of Egypt; For they did not continue in My covenant, And I did not care about them, says the Lord.For this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Israel After those days, declares the Lord: I will put My laws into their minds, And write them on their hearts. And I will be their God, And they shall be My people.And they will not teach, each one his fellow citizen, And each one his brother, saying,‘ Know the Lord,’ For they will all know Me, From the least to the greatest of them.For I will be merciful toward their wrongdoings, And their sins I will no longer remember.”When He said,“ A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is about to disappear.

What I am saying is this: the Law, which came 430 years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise.

For the Law, since it has only a shadow of the good things to come and not the form of those things itself, can never, by the same sacrifices which they offer continually every year, make those who approach perfect.Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, because the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have had consciousness of sins?But in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year.For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.Therefore, when He comes into the world, He says,“ You have not desired sacrifice and offering, But You have prepared a body for Me;You have not taken pleasure in whole burnt offerings and offerings for sin.Then I said,‘ Behold, I have come( It is written of Me in the scroll of the book) To do Your will, O God.’ ”After saying above,“ Sacrifices and offerings and whole burnt offerings and offerings for sin You have not desired, nor have You taken pleasure in them”( which are offered according to the Law),then He said,“ Behold, I have come to do Your will.” He takes away the first in order to establish the second.

Do we then nullify the Law through faith? Far from it! On the contrary, we establish the Law.

Do not be misled by varied and strange teachings; for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, through which those who were so occupied were not benefited.

Brothers and sisters, I speak in terms of human relations: even though it is only a man’s covenant, yet when it has been ratified, no one sets it aside or adds conditions to it.

Tell me, you who want to be under law, do you not listen to the Law?

which is a symbol for the present time. Accordingly both gifts and sacrifices are offered which cannot make the worshiper perfect in conscience,since they relate only to food, drink, and various washings, regulations for the body imposed until a time of reformation.