<< 羅馬書 7:7 >>

本节经文

  • 吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集
    於此吾人更有何說?將謂法即罪乎?無是理也!法非罪、乃所以燭吾之罪耳。法若不曰「毋淫、」則吾將不知淫之為淫矣。
  • 新标点和合本
    这样,我们可说什么呢?律法是罪吗?断乎不是!只是非因律法,我就不知何为罪。非律法说“不可起贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 和合本2010(上帝版)
    这样,我们要怎么说呢?律法是罪吗?绝对不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何为罪;若不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 和合本2010(神版)
    这样,我们要怎么说呢?律法是罪吗?绝对不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何为罪;若不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知何为贪心。
  • 当代译本
    那么,我们可以说律法本身是罪吗?当然不是!没有律法,我们就不知道什么是罪。律法若不说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心。
  • 圣经新译本
    这样,我们可以说什么呢?难道律法是罪吗?绝对不是。不过,如果不是藉着律法,我就不知道什么是罪;如果不是律法说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心。
  • 中文标准译本
    那么,我们要怎么说呢?难道律法是罪吗?绝对不是!然而,要不是藉着律法,我就不知道什么是罪。如果律法没有说“不可贪心”,我就不知道什么是贪心;
  • 新標點和合本
    這樣,我們可說甚麼呢?律法是罪嗎?斷乎不是!只是非因律法,我就不知何為罪。非律法說「不可起貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 和合本2010(上帝版)
    這樣,我們要怎麼說呢?律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何為罪;若不是律法說「不可貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 和合本2010(神版)
    這樣,我們要怎麼說呢?律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!但是,若不是藉着律法,我就不知何為罪;若不是律法說「不可貪心」,我就不知何為貪心。
  • 當代譯本
    那麼,我們可以說律法本身是罪嗎?當然不是!沒有律法,我們就不知道什麼是罪。律法若不說「不可貪心」,我就不知道什麼是貪心。
  • 聖經新譯本
    這樣,我們可以說甚麼呢?難道律法是罪嗎?絕對不是。不過,如果不是藉著律法,我就不知道甚麼是罪;如果不是律法說“不可貪心”,我就不知道甚麼是貪心。
  • 呂振中譯本
    這樣,我們可怎麼說呢?律法是罪麼?斷乎不是。不過、若不是由於律法,我就不知道罪是甚麼。若不是律法說:「你不可貪慾」,我就不知道貪慾是甚麼。
  • 中文標準譯本
    那麼,我們要怎麼說呢?難道律法是罪嗎?絕對不是!然而,要不是藉著律法,我就不知道什麼是罪。如果律法沒有說「不可貪心」,我就不知道什麼是貪心;
  • 文理和合譯本
    然則將何言耶、律豈罪乎、非也、非由律則我未嘗知罪、如律不言毋欲、則我不知欲、
  • 文理委辦譯本
    然則何以言之、律法豈惡之因乎、曰、不然、非法無以見惡、蓋律法不禁欲、吾末由識欲、
  • 施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經
    然則何言、律法即罪乎、非也、然非由律法、我不識罪、律法若不云勿貪、則我不識貪、
  • New International Version
    What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New International Reader's Version
    What should we say then? That the law is sinful? Not at all! Yet I wouldn’t have known what sin was unless the law had told me. The law says,“ Do not want what belongs to other people.”( Exodus 20:17; Deuteronomy 5:21) If the law hadn’t said that, I would not have known what it was like to want what belongs to others.
  • English Standard Version
    What then shall we say? That the law is sin? By no means! Yet if it had not been for the law, I would not have known sin. For I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New Living Translation
    Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said,“ You must not covet.”
  • Christian Standard Bible
    What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! But I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.
  • New American Standard Bible
    What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? Far from it! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • New King James Version
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said,“ You shall not covet.”
  • American Standard Version
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet:
  • Holman Christian Standard Bible
    What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.
  • King James Version
    What shall we say then?[ Is] the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.
  • New English Translation
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! Certainly, I would not have known sin except through the law. For indeed I would not have known what it means to desire something belonging to someone else if the law had not said,“ Do not covet.”
  • World English Bible
    What shall we say then? Is the law sin? May it never be! However, I wouldn’t have known sin, except through the law. For I wouldn’t have known coveting, unless the law had said,“ You shall not covet.”

交叉引用

  • 羅馬書 3:20
    蓋徒恃遵行律法、無人能稱義於天主之前;惟因法而知罪耳。
  • 羅馬書 7:8
    雖然、罪乃乘虛而入、即因其誡命而攪亂吾心、於以引起諸般淫慾。故無法則罪亦不至如此活躍耳。
  • 出埃及記 20:17
  • 申命記 5:21
  • 羅馬書 4:15
    夫法者、刑戮之器也;法之不存、何犯之有。
  • 哥林多前書 15:56
    死亡之毒螫、罪孽也;而罪孽之威權、律法也。
  • 羅馬書 13:9
    『毋犯奸淫、毋殺人、毋偷盜、毋妄證、毋貪人之所有、』以及其他誡律、一言以蔽之、亦曰愛人如己而已。
  • 詩篇 19:7-12
    天行一何健。六合任翱翔。普照無私曲。萬物被其光。妙法洵全美。我魂得歸依。靈證洵萬確。童蒙識玄機。玉律豈有瑕。祇守心自怡。聖典何皎潔。悅目驚新奇。天威分明在。萬古永不移。神斷剖黑白。陰隲定是非。價值邁金石。滋味勝蜜飴。小子知趨避。福祿盡在茲。
  • 羅馬書 3:5
    曰:若人之不義、適足彰天主之義、則就人情言之、吾將何說、豈主之譴怒為不義乎?
  • 以弗所書 5:3
    至於奸非浮穢貪婪之事、非聖徒所可道也。
  • 創世記 3:6
  • 羅馬書 7:13
    豈善且美者、適足以促予之死耶?無是理也!致死之因、惟罪而已。正惟其能使善且美者、轉成致死之具、此罪之所以為罪也。在誡命之明鑒中、罪之醜態畢露矣。
  • 撒母耳記下 11:2
  • 詩篇 119:96
  • 約書亞記 7:21
  • 路加福音 12:15
    因謂眾曰:『爾其慎之、摒絕一切貪婪、人之生命、不在其產業之富裕也。』
  • 彌迦書 2:2
  • 馬太福音 5:28
    第吾語爾、見婦人而懷邪念、心中已犯姦非矣。
  • 羅馬書 4:1
    即就吾祖亞伯漢而論、若祇憑其本身之智力、亦何所得乎?
  • 使徒行傳 20:33
    吾未嘗貪圖他人之金銀衣服;
  • 羅馬書 7:5
    當吾人尚在肉身之權下、吾人之四肢百體、在在受罪惡之牽引。此罪惡者、生於情慾、滋於律法、終則致死亡之果者也。
  • 約翰一書 2:15-16
    毋戀世俗世物;人若戀世、安得有愛慕天父之情、存乎其心。蓋世間所有、不外物欲聲色、榮華富貴。凡此皆非本乎天父、乃本乎人世。
  • 歌羅西書 3:5
    故應將一切卑污之心事、置諸死地,凡淫亂、卑污、邪情、惡慾、貪孌、莫非崇拜偶像之變相、
  • 列王紀上 21:1-4
  • 帖撒羅尼迦前書 4:5
    切勿縱情恣慾、如異邦不識天主者所為也、凡因縱情、
  • 羅馬書 7:11
    蓋罪乘隙而入、利用誡命、以陷我於惑、而成我之戮。
  • 羅馬書 6:15
    雖然、吾人既不隸於法而隸於恩矣、將恃恩而重蹈罪孽乎?無是理也!