Think of it this way. If a father dies and leaves an inheritance for his young children, those children are not much better off than slaves until they grow up, even though they actually own everything their father had.

我说那承受产业的，虽然是全业的主人，但为孩童的时候却与奴仆毫无分别，

我说，虽然那承受产业的是整个产业的主人，但在未成年的时候却与奴隶毫无分别，

我说，虽然那承受产业的是整个产业的主人，但在未成年的时候却与奴隶毫无分别，

然而，产业继承人还年幼时，虽然身为产业的主人，实际上和奴仆没有分别。

我说，那承受产业的，虽然是全部产业的主人，但在孩童的时期，却和奴仆没有分别。

我说：继承人虽然是一切的主人，但是当他还是小孩子的时候，与奴仆没有区别；

我說那承受產業的，雖然是全業的主人，但為孩童的時候卻與奴僕毫無分別，

我說，雖然那承受產業的是整個產業的主人，但在未成年的時候卻與奴隸毫無分別，

我說，雖然那承受產業的是整個產業的主人，但在未成年的時候卻與奴隸毫無分別，

然而，產業繼承人還年幼時，雖然身為產業的主人，實際上和奴僕沒有分別。

我說，那承受產業的，雖然是全部產業的主人，但在孩童的時期，卻和奴僕沒有分別。

我是說後嗣、儘其做孩童時、雖是全業的主人，仍和奴僕沒有差別；

我說：繼承人雖然是一切的主人，但是當他還是小孩子的時候，與奴僕沒有區別；

我謂嗣子雖為全業之主、童蒙時無異於僕、

我亦曰、嗣子雖全業之主、未成人、則似僕、

我言嗣子、雖為全業之主、尚未成人、無異於僕、

竊謂嗣子雖為業主、方在稚齡、則亦無異奴僕、

What I am saying is that as long as an heir is underage, he is no different from a slave, although he owns the whole estate.

Here is what I have been saying. As long as your own children are young, they are no different from slaves in your house. They are no different, even though they will own all the property.

I mean that the heir, as long as he is a child, is no different from a slave, though he is the owner of everything,

Now I say that as long as the heir is a child, he differs in no way from a slave, though he is the owner of everything.

Now I say, as long as the heir is a child, he does not differ at all from a slave, although he is owner of everything,

Now I say that the heir, as long as he is a child, does not differ at all from a slave, though he is master of all,

But I say that so long as the heir is a child, he differeth nothing from a bondservant though he is lord of all;

Now I say that as long as the heir is a child, he differs in no way from a slave, though he is the owner of everything.

Now I say,[ That] the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all;

Now I mean that the heir, as long as he is a minor, is no different from a slave, though he is the owner of everything.

But I say that so long as the heir is a child, he is no different from a bondservant, though he is lord of all,

The son of the slave wife was born in a human attempt to bring about the fulfillment of God’s promise. But the son of the freeborn wife was born as God’s own fulfillment of his promise.

Then Jehoiada brought out Joash, the king’s son, placed the crown on his head, and presented him with a copy of God’s laws. They anointed him and proclaimed him king, and everyone clapped their hands and shouted,“ Long live the king!”

One day Abraham said to his oldest servant, the man in charge of his household,“ Take an oath by putting your hand under my thigh.Swear by the Lord, the God of heaven and earth, that you will not allow my son to marry one of these local Canaanite women.

But you are now being persecuted by those who want you to keep the law, just as Ishmael, the child born by human effort, persecuted Isaac, the child born by the power of the Spirit.

Ahab had seventy sons living in the city of Samaria. So Jehu wrote letters and sent them to Samaria, to the elders and officials of the city, and to the guardians of King Ahab’s sons. He said,“ The king’s sons are with you, and you have at your disposal chariots, horses, a fortified city, and weapons. As soon as you receive this letter,

All his life Joash did what was pleasing in the Lord’s sight because Jehoiada the priest instructed him.