I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!”

我不废掉神的恩；义若是藉着律法得的，基督就是徒然死了。

我不废掉上帝的恩；如果义是藉着律法而获得，那么基督就白白死了。

我不废掉神的恩；如果义是藉着律法而获得，那么基督就白白死了。

我不废弃上帝的恩典，倘若靠遵行律法可以成为义人，基督的死便毫无意义了。

我不废弃神的恩；如果义是藉着律法而来的，基督就白白地死了。

我不弃绝神的恩典，因为义如果是藉着律法而来的，那么，基督就白白地死了。

我不廢掉神的恩；義若是藉着律法得的，基督就是徒然死了。

我不廢掉上帝的恩；如果義是藉着律法而獲得，那麼基督就白白死了。

我不廢掉神的恩；如果義是藉着律法而獲得，那麼基督就白白死了。

我不廢棄上帝的恩典，倘若靠遵行律法可以成為義人，基督的死便毫無意義了。

我不廢棄神的恩；如果義是藉著律法而來的，基督就白白地死了。

我不廢棄上帝的恩；稱義的事若是憑着律法可得，基督就白死了。

我不棄絕神的恩典，因為義如果是藉著律法而來的，那麼，基督就白白地死了。

我不虛上帝之恩、蓋義若由律、則基督之死為徒然矣、

我不負上帝恩、若恃法而稱義、則基督之死徒然矣、

我不棄天主恩、若由律法可得稱義、則基督之死徒然矣、

吾寧能辜負天主之恩寵哉？苟尚緣律法而求義、則基督之死、為徒然矣。』

I do not get rid of the grace of God. What if a person could become right with God by obeying the law? Then Christ died for nothing!

I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness were through the law, then Christ died for no purpose.

I do not treat the grace of God as meaningless. For if keeping the law could make us right with God, then there was no need for Christ to die.

I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing.

I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.”

I do not set aside the grace of God; for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died in vain.”

I do not make void the grace of God: for if righteousness is through the law, then Christ died for nought.

I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing.

I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness[ come] by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

I do not set aside God’s grace, because if righteousness could come through the law, then Christ died for nothing!

I don’t reject the grace of God. For if righteousness is through the law, then Christ died for nothing!”

Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.

And if by grace, then it cannot be based on works; if it were, grace would no longer be grace.

If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood— and indeed the law given to the people established that priesthood— why was there still need for another priest to come, one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron?

know that a person is not justified by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the law, because by the works of the law no one will be justified.

And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith.

Mark my words! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all.Again I declare to every man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole law.You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.

But I said,“ I have labored in vain; I have spent my strength for nothing at all. Yet what is due me is in the Lord’s hand, and my reward is with my God.”

By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain.

Since they did not know the righteousness of God and sought to establish their own, they did not submit to God’s righteousness.

If I rebuild what I destroyed, then I really would be a lawbreaker.

What, then, shall we say in response to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?

And he continued,“ You have a fine way of setting aside the commands of God in order to observe your own traditions!

And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins.

The Lord foils the plans of the nations; he thwarts the purposes of the peoples.

“‘ How can you say,“ We are wise, for we have the law of the Lord,” when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?