僅為宗教上之爭執、實非予所逆料也。不過葆樂肯定有一耶穌、死而復生而已。

不过是有几样辩论，为他们自己敬鬼神的事，又为一个人名叫耶稣，是已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过，有几样辩论是有关他们自己敬鬼神的事，以及一个名叫耶稣的人，他已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过，有几样辩论是有关他们自己敬鬼神的事，以及一个名叫耶稣的人，他已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过是关于他们的宗教和一个叫耶稣的人的一些争论。耶稣已经死了，保罗却说他仍然活着。

他们与他争辩的，只是他们的宗教问题；还论到一位已经死了的耶稣，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过他们与他有一些争议的问题，是关于自己宗教的事，以及关于一个叫耶稣的人——这个人已经死了，保罗却声称他还活着。

不過是有幾樣辯論，為他們自己敬鬼神的事，又為一個人名叫耶穌，是已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過，有幾樣辯論是有關他們自己敬鬼神的事，以及一個名叫耶穌的人，他已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過，有幾樣辯論是有關他們自己敬鬼神的事，以及一個名叫耶穌的人，他已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過是關於他們的宗教和一個叫耶穌的人的一些爭論。耶穌已經死了，保羅卻說他仍然活著。

他們與他爭辯的，只是他們的宗教問題；還論到一位已經死了的耶穌，保羅卻說他是活著的。

不過告他一些關於他們自己敬鬼神之事的問題。又是關於一個已經死了、保羅還指說是活着的耶穌。

不過他們與他有一些爭議的問題，是關於自己宗教的事，以及關於一個叫耶穌的人——這個人已經死了，保羅卻聲稱他還活著。

惟攻之以關乎敬鬼神之道、與一已死之人名耶穌者、而保羅言其生也、

惟論其畏鬼神事、又論已死之耶穌、保羅言其生、為此而訟之、

彼與之爭辯、僅為其敬鬼神之事、又為已死者名耶穌、保羅言其生也、為此而訟之、

Instead, they had some points of dispute with him about their own religion and about a dead man named Jesus who Paul claimed was alive.

Instead, they argued with him about their own beliefs. They didn’t agree about a man named Jesus. They said Jesus was dead, but Paul claimed Jesus was alive.

Rather they had certain points of dispute with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, who was dead, but whom Paul asserted to be alive.

Instead, it was something about their religion and a dead man named Jesus, who Paul insists is alive.

Instead they had some disagreements with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, a dead man Paul claimed to be alive.

but they simply had some points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a dead man, Jesus, whom Paul asserted to be alive.

but had some questions against him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, who had died, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

but had certain questions against him of their own religion, and of one Jesus, who was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

Instead they had some disagreements with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, a dead man Paul claimed to be alive.

But had certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

Rather they had several points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a man named Jesus who was dead, whom Paul claimed to be alive.

but had certain questions against him about their own religion, and about one Jesus, who was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

茲所爭者、僅係理論名詞及爾禮法之辯、爾宜自處、吾則無意予以受理。』

查悉其被控、乃屬若輩禮法上之爭執、並無應死或下獄之罪。

基督未復活、則吾輩之所傳、爾等之所信、悉屬無稽之談矣。不寧惟是、吾人將為天主之偽證矣。蓋死者苟無復活、則天主實未復活基督、而吾人強為之證曰、天主已復活之矣、是非偽證而何。苟死者無復活、則基督亦未復活、基督未復活、則爾所信、實為徒然、爾至今且仍在罪中、而彼安寢於基督懷中者、悉已淪亡矣。苟吾人所望於基督者、僅及斯世、則斯世之最可憐者、應無吾人若矣。然按諸事實、基督固已自死者中復活、而為眾寢者先薦之果矣。

蓋其期已定、將藉其所立之人、以正義而衡天下；斯人無他、即天主所起於死中以徵信於眾者是已。』

即自如望施洗、至其昇天之日、與我同處之人中、遴選一人、共為耶穌復活之見證。』

然予托天主佑、至今猶屹立無恙、向天下生靈、無分貴賤大小、而作證焉。所陳者莫非古先知與摩西預言必成之事、即基督必遇害、且自死中復活。而真光之布於兆民萬邦、實以基督為始。』

至依法所、留百基拉、亞吉拉於此。已復入會堂、與猶太人辯解。

葆樂立於院中曰：『雅典人乎、予觀爾等頗具宗教精神。蓋吾嘗閒步街頭、一覽爾所崇拜之對象、偶值一壇、上書「獻於未識之神。」茲吾欲揭示於爾者、正爾所未識而敬事者也。

顧吾所授於爾者、固有所受也。基督確為吾人之罪而死、一如古經之所預言也；死而乃瘞、第三日自死者中復活、亦一如古經之所預言也。

永生不變；死於一時、而生於永古；掌握死亡及地獄之管籥者。

天主之復活耶穌、吾儕實為見證。

葆樂既至、凡自耶路撒冷而來之猶太人環立、控訴多端、且屬重大事項、而悉不能證實。