惟攻之以關乎敬鬼神之道、與一已死之人名耶穌者、而保羅言其生也、

不过是有几样辩论，为他们自己敬鬼神的事，又为一个人名叫耶稣，是已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过，有几样辩论是有关他们自己敬鬼神的事，以及一个名叫耶稣的人，他已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过，有几样辩论是有关他们自己敬鬼神的事，以及一个名叫耶稣的人，他已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过是关于他们的宗教和一个叫耶稣的人的一些争论。耶稣已经死了，保罗却说他仍然活着。

他们与他争辩的，只是他们的宗教问题；还论到一位已经死了的耶稣，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过他们与他有一些争议的问题，是关于自己宗教的事，以及关于一个叫耶稣的人——这个人已经死了，保罗却声称他还活着。

不過是有幾樣辯論，為他們自己敬鬼神的事，又為一個人名叫耶穌，是已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過，有幾樣辯論是有關他們自己敬鬼神的事，以及一個名叫耶穌的人，他已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過，有幾樣辯論是有關他們自己敬鬼神的事，以及一個名叫耶穌的人，他已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過是關於他們的宗教和一個叫耶穌的人的一些爭論。耶穌已經死了，保羅卻說他仍然活著。

他們與他爭辯的，只是他們的宗教問題；還論到一位已經死了的耶穌，保羅卻說他是活著的。

不過告他一些關於他們自己敬鬼神之事的問題。又是關於一個已經死了、保羅還指說是活着的耶穌。

不過他們與他有一些爭議的問題，是關於自己宗教的事，以及關於一個叫耶穌的人——這個人已經死了，保羅卻聲稱他還活著。

惟論其畏鬼神事、又論已死之耶穌、保羅言其生、為此而訟之、

彼與之爭辯、僅為其敬鬼神之事、又為已死者名耶穌、保羅言其生也、為此而訟之、

僅為宗教上之爭執、實非予所逆料也。不過葆樂肯定有一耶穌、死而復生而已。

Instead, they had some points of dispute with him about their own religion and about a dead man named Jesus who Paul claimed was alive.

Instead, they argued with him about their own beliefs. They didn’t agree about a man named Jesus. They said Jesus was dead, but Paul claimed Jesus was alive.

Rather they had certain points of dispute with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, who was dead, but whom Paul asserted to be alive.

Instead, it was something about their religion and a dead man named Jesus, who Paul insists is alive.

Instead they had some disagreements with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, a dead man Paul claimed to be alive.

but they simply had some points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a dead man, Jesus, whom Paul asserted to be alive.

but had some questions against him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, who had died, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

but had certain questions against him of their own religion, and of one Jesus, who was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

Instead they had some disagreements with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, a dead man Paul claimed to be alive.

But had certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

Rather they had several points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a man named Jesus who was dead, whom Paul claimed to be alive.

but had certain questions against him about their own religion, and about one Jesus, who was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

若辯論言語名稱、及爾律、爾自理之、我不欲判此也、

見所訟者、祇辯論其律、非為當死當繫之事、

基督未起、則我之所宣乃虛、爾之信亦虛、死者不起、則上帝未嘗起基督、而我證其起之、適為妄證於上帝、死者不起、則基督未嘗見起、基督未起、則爾之信徒然、而爾仍在罪中矣、其宗基督而已寢者、亦淪亡焉、若我儕望於基督者、第在今生、則較眾尤可憫也、○然基督誠自死見起、為諸寢者先、

蓋上帝已定一日、將以所立之人、義鞫天下、乃自死復起之、俾眾徵信焉、○

自約翰施洗始、至其別我接昇之日、須於常與我儕偕者、選舉一人、同證其復起也、

然我蒙上帝之佑、今日猶存、並證於尊者卑者之前、所言無非先知及摩西預言之事、即基督必受害、本其由死復起、光照斯民、及異邦人也、○

至以弗所、留二人於彼、自入會堂、與猶太人辯論、

保羅立於亞畧巴古、曰、雅典人乎、我見爾凡事敬畏鬼神、過矣、適遊行時、觀爾所拜者、遇一壇、書曰、未識之神、爾所未識而崇拜者、我明告爾、

我以所受授爾、首焉者、即基督依經所載、為我罪而死、既葬、三日復起、亦依經言也、

始者、終者、生者、我也、我曾死、今則生、至於世世、且有死亡陰府之鑰、

此耶穌為上帝所起、吾儕皆為之證、

自耶路撒冷來之猶太人環立、以多且重之故訟之、而不得其據、